Review



wheat rusts in ethiopia  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc wheat rusts in ethiopia
    Blue: FAO data; grey: <t>wheat</t> stem rust; yellow: wheat stripe rust; red/brown: wheat leaf rust. ( A-D ) show national wheat production statistics of <t>Ethiopia</t> obtained from FAOSTAT . ( E-H ) illustrate our estimates of the damage caused by wheat <t>rusts</t> during years 2010–2019. ( E ) shows the estimated area infected with wheat rusts; ( F ) shows the estimated fraction of yield lost due to wheat rusts; ( G ) shows the approximate total financial loss caused by wheat rusts; and ( H ) shows the approximate loss relative to the national total financial value of wheat produce at market price per year. As no FAO statistics were available for year 2019 at the time of this study (last checked on the 20 th of June 2020), we use the mean of years 2010–2018 as input for our estimates of yield losses in year 2019.
    Wheat Rusts In Ethiopia, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 2032 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/wheat rusts in ethiopia/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 2032 article reviews
    wheat rusts in ethiopia - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Wheat rust epidemics damage Ethiopian wheat production: A decade of field disease surveillance reveals national-scale trends in past outbreaks"

    Article Title: Wheat rust epidemics damage Ethiopian wheat production: A decade of field disease surveillance reveals national-scale trends in past outbreaks

    Journal: PLoS ONE

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245697

    Blue: FAO data; grey: wheat stem rust; yellow: wheat stripe rust; red/brown: wheat leaf rust. ( A-D ) show national wheat production statistics of Ethiopia obtained from FAOSTAT . ( E-H ) illustrate our estimates of the damage caused by wheat rusts during years 2010–2019. ( E ) shows the estimated area infected with wheat rusts; ( F ) shows the estimated fraction of yield lost due to wheat rusts; ( G ) shows the approximate total financial loss caused by wheat rusts; and ( H ) shows the approximate loss relative to the national total financial value of wheat produce at market price per year. As no FAO statistics were available for year 2019 at the time of this study (last checked on the 20 th of June 2020), we use the mean of years 2010–2018 as input for our estimates of yield losses in year 2019.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Blue: FAO data; grey: wheat stem rust; yellow: wheat stripe rust; red/brown: wheat leaf rust. ( A-D ) show national wheat production statistics of Ethiopia obtained from FAOSTAT . ( E-H ) illustrate our estimates of the damage caused by wheat rusts during years 2010–2019. ( E ) shows the estimated area infected with wheat rusts; ( F ) shows the estimated fraction of yield lost due to wheat rusts; ( G ) shows the approximate total financial loss caused by wheat rusts; and ( H ) shows the approximate loss relative to the national total financial value of wheat produce at market price per year. As no FAO statistics were available for year 2019 at the time of this study (last checked on the 20 th of June 2020), we use the mean of years 2010–2018 as input for our estimates of yield losses in year 2019.

    Techniques Used: Infection

    (A-B) wheat stripe rust; (C-D) wheat stem rust; (E-F) wheat leaf rust. Two simple logistic models were used to predict wheat rust occurrence: a temporal model (model 1, see ) predicting wheat rust occurrence as a function of the time since the start of the main wheat season and a spatiotemporal model (model 2, see ), predicting wheat rust occurrence as a function of the time since the start of the main season and the location in Ethiopia (latitude, longitude, and altitude). Model performance was tested by fitting the models to training data from all but 1 year of surveys and then conducting a ROC analysis for testing the performance of the fitted model against the data from the year not used for fitting (repeated for every year). The upper row shows the resulting AUC score of both models for each year and all rusts. The bottom row shows the corresponding ROC curves of one exemplar year. For the analysis illustrated here all survey entries with non-zero disease incidence were classified as “diseased” and all surveys with zero incidence were classified as “healthy”. The testing procedure was also conducted using an alternative dichotomization scheme classifying all surveys with moderate or high incidence values as “diseased” and all surveys with zero or low incidence as “healthy” (see ).
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A-B) wheat stripe rust; (C-D) wheat stem rust; (E-F) wheat leaf rust. Two simple logistic models were used to predict wheat rust occurrence: a temporal model (model 1, see ) predicting wheat rust occurrence as a function of the time since the start of the main wheat season and a spatiotemporal model (model 2, see ), predicting wheat rust occurrence as a function of the time since the start of the main season and the location in Ethiopia (latitude, longitude, and altitude). Model performance was tested by fitting the models to training data from all but 1 year of surveys and then conducting a ROC analysis for testing the performance of the fitted model against the data from the year not used for fitting (repeated for every year). The upper row shows the resulting AUC score of both models for each year and all rusts. The bottom row shows the corresponding ROC curves of one exemplar year. For the analysis illustrated here all survey entries with non-zero disease incidence were classified as “diseased” and all surveys with zero incidence were classified as “healthy”. The testing procedure was also conducted using an alternative dichotomization scheme classifying all surveys with moderate or high incidence values as “diseased” and all surveys with zero or low incidence as “healthy” (see ).

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    96
    MathWorks Inc wheat rusts in ethiopia
    Blue: FAO data; grey: <t>wheat</t> stem rust; yellow: wheat stripe rust; red/brown: wheat leaf rust. ( A-D ) show national wheat production statistics of <t>Ethiopia</t> obtained from FAOSTAT . ( E-H ) illustrate our estimates of the damage caused by wheat <t>rusts</t> during years 2010–2019. ( E ) shows the estimated area infected with wheat rusts; ( F ) shows the estimated fraction of yield lost due to wheat rusts; ( G ) shows the approximate total financial loss caused by wheat rusts; and ( H ) shows the approximate loss relative to the national total financial value of wheat produce at market price per year. As no FAO statistics were available for year 2019 at the time of this study (last checked on the 20 th of June 2020), we use the mean of years 2010–2018 as input for our estimates of yield losses in year 2019.
    Wheat Rusts In Ethiopia, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/wheat rusts in ethiopia/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wheat rusts in ethiopia - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Blue: FAO data; grey: wheat stem rust; yellow: wheat stripe rust; red/brown: wheat leaf rust. ( A-D ) show national wheat production statistics of Ethiopia obtained from FAOSTAT . ( E-H ) illustrate our estimates of the damage caused by wheat rusts during years 2010–2019. ( E ) shows the estimated area infected with wheat rusts; ( F ) shows the estimated fraction of yield lost due to wheat rusts; ( G ) shows the approximate total financial loss caused by wheat rusts; and ( H ) shows the approximate loss relative to the national total financial value of wheat produce at market price per year. As no FAO statistics were available for year 2019 at the time of this study (last checked on the 20 th of June 2020), we use the mean of years 2010–2018 as input for our estimates of yield losses in year 2019.

    Journal: PLoS ONE

    Article Title: Wheat rust epidemics damage Ethiopian wheat production: A decade of field disease surveillance reveals national-scale trends in past outbreaks

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245697

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Blue: FAO data; grey: wheat stem rust; yellow: wheat stripe rust; red/brown: wheat leaf rust. ( A-D ) show national wheat production statistics of Ethiopia obtained from FAOSTAT . ( E-H ) illustrate our estimates of the damage caused by wheat rusts during years 2010–2019. ( E ) shows the estimated area infected with wheat rusts; ( F ) shows the estimated fraction of yield lost due to wheat rusts; ( G ) shows the approximate total financial loss caused by wheat rusts; and ( H ) shows the approximate loss relative to the national total financial value of wheat produce at market price per year. As no FAO statistics were available for year 2019 at the time of this study (last checked on the 20 th of June 2020), we use the mean of years 2010–2018 as input for our estimates of yield losses in year 2019.

    Article Snippet: The methods for detailed analysis of past outbreak patterns include: calculation of the Morans-I statistic for testing spatial autocorrelation and a ‘hotspot’ analysis based on the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic (calculated using the R package spdep [ ]) ; Chi-Square tests, regression analyses and a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis for testing the performance of simple empirical models for predicting wheat rusts in Ethiopia (using the statistics and machine learning toolbox in MATLAB [ ]).

    Techniques: Infection

    (A-B) wheat stripe rust; (C-D) wheat stem rust; (E-F) wheat leaf rust. Two simple logistic models were used to predict wheat rust occurrence: a temporal model (model 1, see ) predicting wheat rust occurrence as a function of the time since the start of the main wheat season and a spatiotemporal model (model 2, see ), predicting wheat rust occurrence as a function of the time since the start of the main season and the location in Ethiopia (latitude, longitude, and altitude). Model performance was tested by fitting the models to training data from all but 1 year of surveys and then conducting a ROC analysis for testing the performance of the fitted model against the data from the year not used for fitting (repeated for every year). The upper row shows the resulting AUC score of both models for each year and all rusts. The bottom row shows the corresponding ROC curves of one exemplar year. For the analysis illustrated here all survey entries with non-zero disease incidence were classified as “diseased” and all surveys with zero incidence were classified as “healthy”. The testing procedure was also conducted using an alternative dichotomization scheme classifying all surveys with moderate or high incidence values as “diseased” and all surveys with zero or low incidence as “healthy” (see ).

    Journal: PLoS ONE

    Article Title: Wheat rust epidemics damage Ethiopian wheat production: A decade of field disease surveillance reveals national-scale trends in past outbreaks

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245697

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A-B) wheat stripe rust; (C-D) wheat stem rust; (E-F) wheat leaf rust. Two simple logistic models were used to predict wheat rust occurrence: a temporal model (model 1, see ) predicting wheat rust occurrence as a function of the time since the start of the main wheat season and a spatiotemporal model (model 2, see ), predicting wheat rust occurrence as a function of the time since the start of the main season and the location in Ethiopia (latitude, longitude, and altitude). Model performance was tested by fitting the models to training data from all but 1 year of surveys and then conducting a ROC analysis for testing the performance of the fitted model against the data from the year not used for fitting (repeated for every year). The upper row shows the resulting AUC score of both models for each year and all rusts. The bottom row shows the corresponding ROC curves of one exemplar year. For the analysis illustrated here all survey entries with non-zero disease incidence were classified as “diseased” and all surveys with zero incidence were classified as “healthy”. The testing procedure was also conducted using an alternative dichotomization scheme classifying all surveys with moderate or high incidence values as “diseased” and all surveys with zero or low incidence as “healthy” (see ).

    Article Snippet: The methods for detailed analysis of past outbreak patterns include: calculation of the Morans-I statistic for testing spatial autocorrelation and a ‘hotspot’ analysis based on the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic (calculated using the R package spdep [ ]) ; Chi-Square tests, regression analyses and a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis for testing the performance of simple empirical models for predicting wheat rusts in Ethiopia (using the statistics and machine learning toolbox in MATLAB [ ]).

    Techniques: